I am ashamed to see these era women fighting for things without knowing why a particular tradition is being followed. Do they mean to say that women who followed it before are mad??? Never mock a tradition in the name of women equality and gender bias..
Today I really wondered when I red the post of a celebrity on social media about the Sabarimala case..Yes..I totally agree we all have the right to speak,but we must be aware about the topic we speak.
Highlighting a point of my friend that has mentioned in the article.
“Sabarimala is a place where there is no discrimination based on caste, creed, religion, language etc.. It is a real tribute to the Indian secularism and harmony. For every temple there are a set of rules to be followed in accordance to the diety and also considering the historical & mythological aspects of the temple. In this case the diety Lord Ayyappa is a Naishtika Brahmachari (celebrate) as a result if which we have these rules. There are many other Ayyappa temples like Kulathoorpuzha, Aryankavu etc where women of all age groups are allowed as the rules in those permits that. And I am damn sure that the majority of so called feminists and others fighting for the entry of women of that particular age group neither know about the deity nor the mythological and historical aspects of Sabarimala. It was the Supreme court that made the non – entrance of women of this particular age group strict on 1991. Even now lets wait for the court’s verdict.”
True.
ReplyDelete:)
Delete